« Venezuelan Debt: Soft Power Matters | Main | What Is "Credit"? AfterPay, Earnin', and ISAs »

Elizabeth Warren & the Dow Corning Bankruptcy: Nothing to See

posted by Adam Levitin

The Washington Post has a story about Senator Elizabeth Warren’s involvement in the Dow Corning bankruptcy that implies that Senator Warren was somehow working against the interests of personal injury victims. That’s rubbish, and it’s frankly irresponsible reporting that fundamentally fails to understand the bankruptcy process and leaves out a critical fact.

Bankruptcies are complicated, so let me relate the Dow Corning story and then what we know of Senator Warren’s minimal involvement. Bottom line is that this is a complete nothing burger, much like the previous Washington Post story with the shocking headline (much mocked, and now amended) that then-Professor Warren had billed [a below-market] rate of $675/hr for her legal work

Here's the properly related story in a nutshell: Senator Warren did some minimal work in support of a deal to ensure compensation for tort victims that was supported by the overwhelming majority (94%) of those tort victims and that was approved by a federal court. That’s a good thing that deserves praise, not some implicit shade.  Alas, the Post doesn't bother to mention the tort victim support for the plan. 

Dow Corning was a 50/50 joint venture between Dow Chemical and Corning, Inc. that manufactured silicone implants of various sorts (mainly breast implants, but not exclusively).  There may have been a link between silicone implants (particularly ruptured ones) and auto-immune problems, and by the early 1990s, lawsuits were piling up against manufacturers of silicone implants, including Dow Corning, Baxter, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. The FDA suspended the marketing and sales of implants and by 1994, there were over 18,000 personal injury lawsuits. The three manufacturers attempted to negotiate a global class action settlement in 1994, which would have had Dow Corning paying $2 billion into a $4.25 billion fund, but far more claims were filed than expected, so the settlement fell apart, and in 1995 Dow Corning filed for bankruptcy. When it filed, there were over 19,000 personal injury suits and 45 class actions pending.

Upon Dow Corning’s filing for bankruptcy, the United States Trustee (the Department of Justice official in charge of ensuring fair play in the bankruptcy process and with some other statutory duties), appointed a committee to represent tort claimants (the Tort Committee). Resolving the mass tort claims was the major issue in the bankruptcy; without a deal, it would not be possible for Dow Corning to come up with a workable plan that would provide money to women and allow the company to move forward. Therefore, Dow-Corning negotiated with the Tort Committee and made a couple settlement offers that were rejected, after which the court appointed a mediator.

By 1998, Dow Corning and the Tort Committee had reached a deal that they took to the court for approval as part of a Chapter 11 plan. The deal created a $2.35 billion trust to pay out claims, funded by contributions from Dow Corning, Dow Chemical, and Corning, Inc. The Dow Corning trust was structured such that tort claimants could choose among a few options: they could accept a payment to have the implant removed, accept a standardized payment based on their injury and treatment, or litigate their claims against the trust if they didn’t want to settle.  94.1% of the tort claimants who voted chose to approve the plan (including the settlement), and the plan and settlement were ultimately approved by the federal bankruptcy court and upheld on appeal. The Post mentions that Warren's team pointed out the overwhelming support, but didn't report it as a fact, much less report the specific number.

So, what does this have to do with Senator Warren? Senator Warren worked briefly as a consultant for Dow Chemical, one of the shareholders of the debtor. I understand that her involvement began well after Dow Corning had filed for bankruptcy, and most of her work was done after the settlement had been worked out. We don’t know the precise details of her work from over twenty years ago (does anyone remember all the details of expert work they did 20 years ago?), but given her expertise in mass tort bankruptcies, particularly in setting up and defending settlement trusts, it would stand to reason that Dow Chemical wanted her assistance in getting court approval of the deal.

More importantly, no one can credibly claim that the settlement was the result of an unfair process.  It was the product of lengthy, mediated negotiations and was supported by 94.1% of the personal injury claimants who voted on it, and ultimately approved by the bankruptcy court and upheld by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Washington Post piece also attempts to make hay out of one anonymous source who says that Senator Warren’s work was for a company that “had containing the company’s liability as a goal.” Well, sure—of course that was the company’s goal. Is that supposed to be bad? The whole point of bankruptcy is to find the fairest deal possible for everyone involved, and then limit liability going forward to the extent possible. This is because preserving companies as going-concerns is often better than selling them off for parts. In this case, the parties arrived at an agreement that limited Dow Chemical’s future liability in exchange for capitalizing a multi-billion dollar trust to pay out victims well into the future.  That was good enough for the overwhelming majority of the people with personal injury claims who voted on the plan.

Bankruptcy is a process that tries to make the best of a bad situation, and that’s what Senator Warren’s work was doing. She was making lemonade out of the lemons life dealt. The deal that Senator Warren helped with was as good as there was to be had, and it was a deal that helped maximize value while ensuring fair treatment to tort victims. The whole purpose of settlement trusts like the one used in Dow Corning is to do just that. Senator Warren was one the nation’s experts in setting up and defending settlement trusts. The whole body of Senator Warren’s bankruptcy work is all about making the system fairer for all involved. To suggest otherwise is ridiculous.

[p.s.  quiz for Slips readers--can you identify the unnamed law student in the center of picture with then-Professor Warren?]


This is not a news source it is article marketing being create as a counter record of Warrens 1990s activities with corporate America. Warren has not released the tax records from this period. A period of time where she entered the 1% working for the companies she claims to hate today.

Why would you expect Warren to have her tax records from the 1990s, much less release them? Normal people do not retain tax records for 20-30 years. She wasn't even thinking of running for office until 2011 or so. It's disingenuous to imply that she's hiding something because she hasn't released her tax records or her elementary school transcript.

I had clients in the Dow Corning case -- not major players, but I was following the docket, filed a couple of things and appeared at a hearing or two. I either was not aware at the time of Warren's involvement or had forgotten it before seeing this piece. Certainly there was no indication that she played a significant role in shaping the plan, or in any other contested issue.

Another Bezos hatchet-job. Way to go, WaPo.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Current Guests

Follow Us On Twitter

Like Us on Facebook

  • Like Us on Facebook

    By "Liking" us on Facebook, you will receive excerpts of our posts in your Facebook news feed. (If you change your mind, you can undo it later.) Note that this is different than "Liking" our Facebook page, although a "Like" in either place will get you Credit Slips post on your Facebook news feed.



  • As a public service, the University of Illinois College of Law operates Bankr-L, an e-mail list on which bankruptcy professionals can exchange information. Bankr-L is administered by one of the Credit Slips bloggers, Professor Robert M. Lawless of the University of Illinois. Although Bankr-L is a free service, membership is limited only to persons with a professional connection to the bankruptcy field (e.g., lawyer, accountant, academic, judge). To request a subscription on Bankr-L, click here to visit the page for the list and then click on the link for "Subscribe." After completing the information there, please also send an e-mail to Professor Lawless ([email protected]) with a short description of your professional connection to bankruptcy. A link to a URL with a professional bio or other identifying information would be great.