Nortel Survives (First?) Appeal -- Canadian Edition
Unlike the bankruptcy judges in Nortel, who synchronized their trials in a landmark case of cross-border insolvency cooperation, the appellate judges run at their own speed, so results will trickle in here and there.
The Canadians got through their appeal first, and the 3-0 ruling from the panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal was rightly withering of the losing appellants. In response to the argument accusing the trial judge of applying -- instead of the correct law of property entitlements -- his own "commercial judicial moralism," the panel had this to say on his analysis:
"Based on those facts, he concluded that a pro rata order constituted the answer to the allocation issue. The fact that the answer is also fair should not detract from the force of his conclusion."
Who said Canadians can't be snarky, or at the very least passive-aggressive?
The next stage in Canada would be the Supreme Court, which requires leave to appeal, although its grant rate is higher than the U.S. Supreme Court's cert rate. Stay tuned!
Anybody know where one can get a hold of the actual decision? Has anyone posted it?
Posted by: Christopher | May 12, 2016 at 03:28 PM
As requested http://www.ontariocourts.ca/decisions/2016/2016ONCA0332.htm
Posted by: SAN | May 16, 2016 at 11:59 AM
Thank you.
Posted by: Christopher | May 19, 2016 at 10:58 AM
I enjoyed this post man, its cool and nice also https://goo.gl/38ld2s
Posted by: karan | May 21, 2016 at 01:25 AM