« Sousa on Bankruptcy Stigma | Main | Cui bono? »

My Crimean Summers and Ukraine's Odious Debts

posted by Anna Gelpern

Crimea Every elementary school summer I was shipped out of Leningrad on a two-day train journey to the Black Sea, where a succession of family members would make me eat tomatoes and roast in the sun for three months to store vitamins for the winter. A human conserve. My Soviet engineer parents would rent a room in someone's rickety dacha on the outskirts of Sevastopol--one rouble per bed, except for the high-end place with lace-trimmed pillowcases that went for one-fifty. The fellow to the right  was our landlord, already chocolate-brown in early June, sleeping it off next to his sandy-brown boxer, when we were still fresh-from-the-north gray-green (photo courtesy dad). Sevastopol was a "closed" military city then, but to me, it was one happy, sleepy, dusty morning walk to the beach, trying to spy a poppy flower, sand, salt, sand, and sleepier afternoons under the sour cherry tree, trying to spy the landlady's grandson. Bleached, salty brown with a spot of red.

Alexander SackIt is weird to think of my sleepy childhood as the latest "breakaway province," but there you have it. Which brings me to a genius phrase coined in 1927 by a Russian emigrant law scholar in Paris: Odious Debt. Contemplating the Bolsheviks and their lawless ways, Alexander Sack (photo courtesy of Sarah Ludington and Mitu Gulatisynthesized disparate doctrines that came before when he described debt tainted at inception--not because the debtor cannot pay--but because creditors knowingly lent to a government that oppressed its people. This is debt that should not be paid even if it could be.

In a separate series of posts at PIIE, I have suggested that Ukraine should not--even if it could--repay Russia's last-minute advance to prop up the Yanukovych government, and that the U.K. should make this debt unenforceable. The logic is Odious Debt, the method is not.

Some see Odious Debt as an established doctrine with considerable redemptive potential. Others see it as a mix of wishful thinking and bad policy. I do not think that the doctrine as defined to date is worth fighting for. It is narrow, cumbersome, and--perhaps most devastating--a safety valve to preserve and legitimate the corrupt and oppressive finance that escapes the odiousness tag.

Unlike the doctrine, the idea that illegitimate debt should not be paid seems immensely intuitive. It deserves a workable institutional home. Maybe two.

One home is transitional justice--audits and truth commissions that painstakingly wade through the borrowings of deposed governments. Truth commissions are morally and institutionally satisfying: they use legal process to sort the truly odious from the faintly smelly. If the commission is legitimate, so are its odiousness findings. We have not seen debt commissions much, not even for the bloodiest tyrants, perhaps because new governments usually need debt relief right away, and creditors are only happy to give it to them to avoid the inquiry and preempt the doctrine.

Another home is sanctions. Odious Debt as sanctions is not nearly as satisfying. Financial sanctions privilege major financial powers like the United Kingdom--much as humanitarian intervention is easier done by major military powers. The approach is self-limiting (maybe too self-limiting), since a major financial power will not be major for long if it picks and chooses debts to enforce every week. And it is far form clear that Yanukovych and his bonds are the worst of the lot, even though they sport some pretty outrageous contract terms designed to help Russia make a quick market exit and upset Ukraine's entire debt structure

But as sanctions go, closing the courts to Yanukovych bonds and making them toxic in the markets is more practical and meaningful than most approaches on the table. Sadly for Ukraine, Russia, and Odious Debt, it is the least--and the most--that the West would do for now.


UK government borrowed 8% of GDP in 2013. And, knowing that, isn't it a brilliant idea to say some international debt is inenforceable? China would be especially happy with the news.

In other ords:

The UK owed 10,090,000,000,000 USD of external debt on 31 December 2012, which is 160,158 USD per capita, and makes 406% of GDP.

Do you really want this country to undermine credibility of international debt system?

Dmitri: the UK Government borrows in its own currency. It is completely irrelevant to Ukraine debt, which is not in its own currency.

Also, you are quoting UK gross external debt, not net. The UK - meaning its companies and individual investors - owns about $10trn in external assets, so its net international investment position is almost exactly zero.

This stuff about the UK being hugely indebted is just ignorant nonsense.

Mr. Livesey is right. We have too many "discussions" about sovereign debt that ignore Modern Monetary Theory in general and the the relationship between sovereign currency and debt in particular. We end up with groundless panic over US and UK debt, while the fact that the euro is NOT a sovereign currency and lacks many strengths possessed by both the dollar and pound is ignored.

I am lim young song i was in need of a loan of S$100,000 and was scammed by Those fraudulent lenders and a friend introduce me to Mr Hwa Jurong,and he lend Me the loan without any stress,you can contact him at e-mails. [email protected] or [email protected] .... [email protected] .

Good Day !!!!!

I am Hwa Jurong, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money
Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance.
Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills?
i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary
assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to
reliable individuals.

Services Rendered include:
*Home Improvement
*Inventor Loans
*Auto Loans
*Debt Consolidation
*Horse Loans
*Line of Credit
*Second Mortgage
*Business Loans
*Personal Loans
*International Loans.
Please write back if interested.
Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social
security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to
be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ...
Yours Sincerely,

Hwa Jurong(MD).

The comments to this entry are closed.


Current Guests

Follow Us On Twitter

Like Us on Facebook

  • Like Us on Facebook

    By "Liking" us on Facebook, you will receive excerpts of our posts in your Facebook news feed. (If you change your mind, you can undo it later.) Note that this is different than "Liking" our Facebook page, although a "Like" in either place will get you Credit Slips post on your Facebook news feed.



  • As a public service, the University of Illinois College of Law operates Bankr-L, an e-mail list on which bankruptcy professionals can exchange information. Bankr-L is administered by one of the Credit Slips bloggers, Professor Robert M. Lawless of the University of Illinois. Although Bankr-L is a free service, membership is limited only to persons with a professional connection to the bankruptcy field (e.g., lawyer, accountant, academic, judge). To request a subscription on Bankr-L, click here to visit the page for the list and then click on the link for "Subscribe." After completing the information there, please also send an e-mail to Professor Lawless ([email protected]) with a short description of your professional connection to bankruptcy. A link to a URL with a professional bio or other identifying information would be great.