« Brains for Hire | Main | Jeff Redfern Meets the Repo Man »
The comments to this entry are closed.
Credit Slips is pleased to have had the following persons join us as continuing blog authors in the past or as guest bloggers for a week. Their contributions have added new perspectives and ideas to this site, and we thank them for their participation.
PAST REGULAR CONTRIBUTORS
GUEST & OCCASIONAL CONTRIBUTORS
By "Liking" us on Facebook, you will receive excerpts of our posts in your Facebook news feed. (If you change your mind, you can undo it later.) Note that this is different than "Liking" our Facebook page, although a "Like" in either place will get you Credit Slips post on your Facebook news feed.
I would like to dispute:
"The only way the government guarantee would have changed this is if it were nothing more than a fig leaf, disguising what would have been for all intents a government-financed debtor-in-possession loan."
I think it would have been possible to subsidize a DIP loan so that the DIP provider only had some percent of of their investment at risk. The percent might be 50%, 25%, or 5% The precise amount could be determined by a bidding process.
Berkshire-Hathaway had money for a price and sufficient security all through the crisis.
I don't think it was an all or nothing situation.
Note that the 2010 IPO was helped along by the existence of tax losses carried over from old GM to new GM.
Posted by: AndrewDover | October 23, 2012 at 01:36 PM
It's hard to take anything either candidate says about GM very seriously. Everything is merely calculated to appeal to their base while trying to win independents in Ohio. Factual accuracy is at best secondary.
Trying to counter political positioning with appeals to facts seems like a rather thankless task.
Posted by: D | October 23, 2012 at 03:14 PM
Note that Judge Gerber in his decision on the 16th states, entirely in dictum but still, at page 11 that no private money was available.
Posted by: mt | October 23, 2012 at 03:37 PM
AndrewDover - I think you are describing exactly what Mr. Lubben was referring to as a fig leaf. Unless the public risk amount was quite low, all you are describing is a public subsidy to a private lender to offer a loan. I also don't think that this is what Romney thinks he means, although as D points out, he probably doesn't really mean anything except for vague talking points.
Posted by: Whitfit | October 23, 2012 at 04:11 PM