« Madoff and Trustee Incentives | Main | Freep, froop, frop . . . No, It's Pottow! »

What Is Private Equity?

posted by Adam Levitin

The Presidential campaign's focus on Mitt Romney's record at Bain Capital suffers from a confusion about what private equity is. Steven Rattner starts to lay this out in a NYT column, but I think the issue could still benefit from some clarification.

The rubric private equity covers a number of very different investment strategies. It is sometimes used to refer to venture capital--funding of small, young, privately held companies that are looking to grow. Many of these companies fail (think of the vast graveyard of failed Internet startups, including my own), but expansion is the goal. 

Alternatively, private equity can refer to investment strategies that involve taking public companies private and restructuring the company with a goal of taking the company public again several years in the future. This is the leveraged buyout or LBO strategy. The acquisition of the target company is done via a tender offer financed by a small (or occasionally no) equity contribution from the LBO sponsor (e.g., Bain) and a lot of bank debt, whic his secured by all the assets of the target company. The sponsor ends up owning the target and puts its own management team in place.

Unlike a VC investment, which is looking to grow a company, an LBO sponsor is typically looking to slim down the target company and make it lean and mean--which it has to be in order to service the very high debt load incurred in the LBO. And that often means firing people. Thus, even when an LBO works, it doesn't necessarily result in job creation. When and LBO fails--the target company isn't able to service its debt--the result is usually bankruptcy. What happens to the employees then really depends, but I wouldn't want to be in their shoes. 

To grossly oversimplify, we might think of VC as a more socially benign type of investment than the LBO. The best case for the LBO socially is that it is akin to culling a herd to make the rest more viable. It's tough love. A longer normative post on this is to come, but I think it's important to get the definitional issue squared away.  

What confuses the private equity definitional issue with Bain is that Bain did not do either strategy exclusively. Rattner explains that Bain shifted from VC investment to LBOs. Romney likes to emphasize Bain's VC work, Obama likes to emphasize the failed LBOs. I think the more interesting issue is why Bain shifted from VC to LBOs. That's something to take up in the normative post, however. 

Comments

I think the most important factor about venture capital, PE, hedge funds etc. is that once the capital being invested gets above a certain scale, say over $100 million, it starts to include not just the founders' money but also pension and endowment money. And, once you get to the large asset managers, you are talking about investments principally being made on behalf of such outside investors. In many cases, that pension money is state and local government workers' pension funds, or union pension funds and some times fortune 500 companies' pensions. The endowments are universities' and charitable organizations' endowments. A company like Bain is making these investments on their behalf and co-investing alongside of these investors. Unfortunately, the media always reports it as if a small group of rich guys are buying and selling these companies but the economic substance is that the purchase money and the profits and losses are significantly attributable to a much broader constituency of retirement savers, taxpayers, and do-gooders.

In your list of what PE firms do, you overlook a significant type of investment which is buying divisions, subsidiaries or lines of business from larger companies that want to scale down or concentrate on other lines of business. One of the most successful example of such investment was the acquisition of Solutia's nylon business in 2009 in the depths of the recession by SK Capital Partners, who saved the business from a complete shutdown. Fast forward to 2012 and the business, renamed Ascend Performance Materials, is thriving because of the collapse of natural gas prices which are a major cost component. "Instead of a closed plant, the Decatur facility has 210 employees and 120 permanent contractors on site. Instead of an end to production, Ascend has expanded production. Rather than cut the pay of its employees, Ascend has reinstated benefits that Solutia cut during bankruptcy and implemented performance bonuses."

You can read about it here:
http://live.decaturdaily.com/detail_full.html?check=61735&cb

The comments to this entry are closed.

Contributors

Current Guests

Follow Us On Twitter

Like Us on Facebook

  • Like Us on Facebook

    By "Liking" us on Facebook, you will receive excerpts of our posts in your Facebook news feed. (If you change your mind, you can undo it later.) Note that this is different than "Liking" our Facebook page, although a "Like" in either place will get you Credit Slips post on your Facebook news feed.

News Feed

Categories

Bankr-L

  • As a public service, the University of Illinois College of Law operates Bankr-L, an e-mail list on which bankruptcy professionals can exchange information. Bankr-L is administered by one of the Credit Slips bloggers, Professor Robert M. Lawless of the University of Illinois. Although Bankr-L is a free service, membership is limited only to persons with a professional connection to the bankruptcy field (e.g., lawyer, accountant, academic, judge). To request a subscription on Bankr-L, click here to visit the page for the list and then click on the link for "Subscribe." After completing the information there, please also send an e-mail to Professor Lawless (rlawless@illinois.edu) with a short description of your professional connection to bankruptcy. A link to a URL with a professional bio or other identifying information would be great.

OTHER STUFF