« This-Is-It EU Summit Eupdate | Main | Don't Give Me Whys and Wherefores »

Lies and Denial: the 2012 GOP Strategy

posted by Adam Levitin

The last 24 hours have witnessed some remarkable historical revisionism on financial regulation coming out of the GOP.

First, we had one of the most bizarre and simply untrue attack ads I've ever seen, courtesy of Karl Rove's Crossroads GPS outfit. The ad calumnies Elizabeth Warren, claiming that first she was responsible for the TARP bailout and then set out to butter up bankers. Is this man on drugs? Rove seems to be confusing Elizabeth Warren with George W. Bush. 

Let's set the record straight.  Elizabeth Warren involvement with TARP was as chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel.  That was a body created by Congress to monitor and report on the effectiveness of TARP bailout.  The Oversight Panel did not create the bailout.  Congress did at the urging of the Bush Administration. The Oversight Panel had absolutely no authority to direct the use of the bailout. Its sole authority was to act as a watchdog.

And what a watchdog it was! It was Elizabeth Warren's trenchant criticism of the bailout that catapulted her to the national stage. The reason she started being invited to appear on the Daily Show and the like was because there was no better and more articulate critic of the bailout than Elizabeth Warren. The Oversight Panel could easily have been a sleepy, impotent backwater. Elizabeth Warren turned it into a ferocious bully pulpit for the interests of middle class Americans who were confused and angry over what was happening to their country. To blame Elizabeth Warren for the bailout is like calling Larry Bird the greatest New York Knick ever. It's so ridiculous that it's insulting. (And fighting words in Boston.) 

Then there's a hooter of a claim that Elizabeth Warren was courting bankers. Let's put that in some context to show how silly the charge is.  Elizabeth Warren left the Oversight Panel to help push for the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and for a long time it was thought that she would be nominated as the Bureau's Director. One reason she wasn't nominated was because the banks took an "over our dead [but now rescusitated via bailouts thank you very much] bodies" approach to Warren, claiming that she was "anti-bank."

Now, some might think that's a compliment, but Warren tried to show that she's not anti-bank. She just wants fair, transparent markets.  (Apparently, that's a problem for banks.  Heck, apparently, if you want market to be fair, and transparent and work as they are supposed to that makes one anti-bank, a socialist, a communist, or worse.  Capitalism, it turns out has nothing to do with markets.) To show that she wasn't anti-bank, Warren took great pains to reach out to banks and to show them that she's open-minded and willing to listen to their concerns, especially the concerns of small community banks and credit unions.  So now Elizabeth Warren is being damned for having been gracious and fair and open-minded. 

For more commentary on this lunacy, see here and here

The second bit of revisionism came with the Senate GOP's filibuster of Richard Cordray's CFPB nomination. So now we have a manque agency. It exists on paper, has a staff, and has authority to enforce the existing federal consumer financial protection laws. In theory, it could do rulemakings under those existing laws (but that would require the Treasury Secretary to exercise his authority as acting CFPB Director). The agency can't use any of the new powers given to it by Dodd-Frank. This is a situation only a banker could love: there's a consumer agency, and it can't do very much. That's the best of all worlds. One might be forgiven for thinking that we aren't in the midst of the worst foreclosure crisis in US history or that predatory mortgage lending wasn't a major contributor to the financial crisis.  

What worries me about all of this is that I don't think these are isolated incidents. Instead, I think there is a very willful type of revisionism at play here. (Perhaps this should not be surprising given that the 2012 GOP Presidential nominee might be the author of historical fiction books based on the premise that the Confederacy prevailed in the Civil War.) I experienced this know-nothing revisionism myself last month at a House Financial Services Committee hearing.  Some GOP backbencher harrangued me for five minutes about how I had no right to be concerned about a bill that would authorize voodoo accounting and encourage foreclosures because I was personally responsible for the TARP bailout. Yeah, this guy thought that I had been the architect of the whole damn bailout.  Perhaps I should have been flattered. 

OK, I admit it.  I TARPed. It was all my fault.  WTF?!  I finally had to explain to this gentleman that I had merely been a lawyer working for the Congressional Oversight Panel and that it was Congress--including lots of GOP Representatives and Senators, who approved the TARP bailout. The Oversight Panel was just a monitoring body. (If I had been a little quicker on my feet, I might have added that surely the gentleman was not also accusing his GOP colleague Rep. Jeb Hensarling, who served on the Congressional Oversight Panel, of being responsible for the bailout.)

Karl Rove's ad is hoping to play off of voters' stupidity. But maybe his impression of the Massachusetts electorate has formed from spending too much time with the likes of my Congressional interlocutor.  


Sheesh. Gaslighting on a national level.

A penchant for truth-telling has never been a consistent hallmark of politicians, and certainly is not not now. Serious offenses are not found symmetrically across the political spectrum, as much as editorial boards like to think otherwise. Anyone who is greatly surprised at the "Elizabeth Warren loves Wall Street" attack has not been paying attention.

Rove isn't on drugs; he's using his standard tactic, which he's done on countless occasions: peddling the Big Lie. You should ask whether the populace is on drugs, since we keep swallowing this garbage. And whether the news media are on the take, since they keep shoveling it.

This is the classic Rove strategy of attacking the opponent's strength. Case in point: Swift Boat ads against John Kerry.

Makes me want to donate to Elizabeth Warren. I'm goingto give her $50 right now.

Agreed, this is silly. There are much more substantive reasons to be concerned about Elizabeth Warren and her agenda. (BTW, I may not be that versed in the Gingrich canon, but I don't think that he proposed an alternative history in which the south won the Civil War. At least, not the book that you scornfully cite.)

My bad. The Confederacy doesn't win the Civil War in this alternate history, it just
prevails at Gettysburg, but gets whupped later at Frederick. I got confused with Turtledove. Beach reading, beach reading...

Whether or not you are a conservative or liberal
the problem is rhetoric, it seems the other side just likes to take don't obama, trouble is the banks, the dems try to paint the gop as the friend of the banks which can be true for deregulation, then the gop tries to bank the dems as being a secret conspiracy with bankers, vague but perceived
such as pelosi's wealth and donations.

Truth is corporations regardless of banking or not
don't like consumer rights and protections,
just look at what the us chamber lobbies for,
everything from the corporations version of "tort reform" (as opposed to contract lawsuits),
to pharmacy lobbying, country of origin laws,

Are regulations going too far, you can try to say yes to be "fair and balanced" but to the GOP
and its corporate allies,a few regulations are going too far. The bailout and tarp is a red cover, most of the money was paid back, and folks need to know that the problem exceeds funds

If warren went too far, she would then be considered a socialist right?

Wow! I saw this ad this morning during the local news. I can not believe it is legal to air an ad that is so distorted! I am going to donate to Warren's campaign right now - I may even volunteer too.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Current Guests

Follow Us On Twitter

Like Us on Facebook

  • Like Us on Facebook

    By "Liking" us on Facebook, you will receive excerpts of our posts in your Facebook news feed. (If you change your mind, you can undo it later.) Note that this is different than "Liking" our Facebook page, although a "Like" in either place will get you Credit Slips post on your Facebook news feed.



  • As a public service, the University of Illinois College of Law operates Bankr-L, an e-mail list on which bankruptcy professionals can exchange information. Bankr-L is administered by one of the Credit Slips bloggers, Professor Robert M. Lawless of the University of Illinois. Although Bankr-L is a free service, membership is limited only to persons with a professional connection to the bankruptcy field (e.g., lawyer, accountant, academic, judge). To request a subscription on Bankr-L, click here to visit the page for the list and then click on the link for "Subscribe." After completing the information there, please also send an e-mail to Professor Lawless ([email protected]) with a short description of your professional connection to bankruptcy. A link to a URL with a professional bio or other identifying information would be great.