Two worlds and in between
A discussion about why nation-by-nation bankruptcy fails when dealing with global enterprises, here.
« Predicting the Next Chapter 11 Wave | Main | Financial Stability Board Calls for Effective Consumer Finance Protection »
A discussion about why nation-by-nation bankruptcy fails when dealing with global enterprises, here.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Credit Slips is pleased to have had the following persons join us as continuing blog authors in the past or as guest bloggers for a week. Their contributions have added new perspectives and ideas to this site, and we thank them for their participation.
PAST REGULAR CONTRIBUTORS
GUEST & OCCASIONAL CONTRIBUTORS
By "Liking" us on Facebook, you will receive excerpts of our posts in your Facebook news feed. (If you change your mind, you can undo it later.) Note that this is different than "Liking" our Facebook page, although a "Like" in either place will get you Credit Slips post on your Facebook news feed.
I would disagree, if bankruptcy systems gave a priority to nonadjusting creditors.
Adjusting creditors (i.e., banks and bonds) almost always fund through the parent. If there were only adjusting creditors, subs really couldn't go bankrupt--they would be simple bags of assets and flow-through vehicles for incidental liabilities like trade credit and paychecks. The problem here is that the non-adjusting creditors are stuck down in the subsidiary level, and they don't receive a priority.
The problems of cross-border multi-entity insolvency are not inherent. They're largely self-inflicted.
Posted by: Ebenezer Scrooge | October 27, 2011 at 09:58 AM