Do you feel the same?
Over at Dealbook, I look at the very different treatment awaiting unsecured creditors of Countrywide, depending on whether they are bondholders or tort litigants.
« OCC Servicing Settlement--Will Homeowners Get Screwed (Again)? | Main | SemCrude Again »
Over at Dealbook, I look at the very different treatment awaiting unsecured creditors of Countrywide, depending on whether they are bondholders or tort litigants.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Credit Slips is pleased to have had the following persons join us as continuing blog authors in the past or as guest bloggers for a week. Their contributions have added new perspectives and ideas to this site, and we thank them for their participation.
PAST REGULAR CONTRIBUTORS
GUEST & OCCASIONAL CONTRIBUTORS
By "Liking" us on Facebook, you will receive excerpts of our posts in your Facebook news feed. (If you change your mind, you can undo it later.) Note that this is different than "Liking" our Facebook page, although a "Like" in either place will get you Credit Slips post on your Facebook news feed.
Stuart's question over there about potential equitable subordination of the bondholders' claims is intriguing. It seems to me that subordination in the CW bankruptcy would not affect the bondholders' rights against BAC on the guarantee (whether they collect something or nothing in the CW case, they still get paid in full by BAC, no?). Nonetheless, equitable subordination would at least reserve any value that CW has for the fraud victims. Is there any value in the CW entity, or would this be a fight not worth fighting?
Posted by: Jason Kilborn | October 05, 2011 at 10:00 AM