Securitization Fail Probe
This story shouldn't surprise Credit Slips readers.
« Still Not Working Abroad | Main | Debt Collector Pseudonyms »
This story shouldn't surprise Credit Slips readers.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Credit Slips is pleased to have had the following persons join us as continuing blog authors in the past or as guest bloggers for a week. Their contributions have added new perspectives and ideas to this site, and we thank them for their participation.
PAST REGULAR CONTRIBUTORS
GUEST & OCCASIONAL CONTRIBUTORS
By "Liking" us on Facebook, you will receive excerpts of our posts in your Facebook news feed. (If you change your mind, you can undo it later.) Note that this is different than "Liking" our Facebook page, although a "Like" in either place will get you Credit Slips post on your Facebook news feed.
"If the trusts did not comply with tax laws, for example, the beneficial treatment given to investors could be rescinded, causing taxes to be levied on the transactions."
In addition to the bogus foreclosures, to me this is where the real fraud may lie.
Posted by: Jim O'Connor | June 13, 2011 at 08:21 AM
I am aware of at least on suit brought on behalf of certificateholders which alleges that the Trustee, the underwriters, the sellers, etc. are all liable for creating a MBS that lacks title to the underlying loans and therefore lacks enforcement rights against a defaulting borrower. In effect the suit is alleging allegthe security is not "mortgage backed." Dexia Holdings v. Countrywide.
Posted by: Steven M. Weiss, Esq. | June 14, 2011 at 09:38 AM
Unfortunately, this particular investigation is a blind alley based upon a totally false paradigm.
Those who fail to perceive and actually understand the nature, character and origins of the foreclosure fraud scandal continue to propagate the false paradigm of securitization failure.
Hopefully, the investigation will have some mild utility in helping the investigators to understand the true nature and facts of securitization. But this will NOT prove securitization failure, but will support the proof of systemic forgery, perjury and evidence fabrication in foreclosure by the servicers, foreclosure mill law firms and their contract forgers and perjurers.
Unfortunately, by focusing on a false paradigm supported by false premises, the focus and energy of the probe is also being misdirected. It would be very unfortunate if this misdirection results in a dishonest declaration that the matter has been investigated and found to be without merit (which will be TRUE), allowing the AG to prematurely terminate the investigation without exploring the actual mischief.
Those without knowledge of the facts who send investogators on wild goose chases need to carefully assess whether their efforts are helpful are rather as pernicious as those who call in false fire alarms!
Posted by: William Roper | June 17, 2011 at 01:23 PM