« Moratorium for What? | Main | Some Thoughts on the MGM Prepack »

Basel III and Cushy Capital

posted by Anna Gelpern

BaselCropped The Annual Meetings of the IMF and the World Bank this past weekend were mostly notable for the depth and breadth of political discord underlying the veneer of recent technocratic accomplishment in financial regulation.  So many things can go truly wrong in the next few months, from currency wars to institutional governance, that I was only glad to look on the bright side as I listened to Mario Draghi of the Bank of Italy, chair of the Financial Stability Board, give a thoughtful speech at the Peterson Institute on Friday (I expect they will post a video shortly).  Among the regulatory accomplishmens, he reasonably highlighted the recently agreed revision to the Basel Capital Accords, or Basel III.  For a description, I prefer the speeches here and here to the official press release.  The widely recognized achievement is tightening the consensus definition of bank capital, and building up (over a looooong time) additional cushions to absorb liquidity shocks. 

In other words, this iteration of Basel focuses heavily on the numerator of the capital adequacy fraction, rather than finessing the risky asset denominator.   Yet as I listened to Draghi, I found myself doodling along the cushion metaphor on the margins.  Would strapping ever bigger cushions around the risky asset rocket make us safe?  To be sure, at some point the rocket might just be too heavy to fly too far, and that might be a good thing.  Or all the goose down might get too expensive.  And if the rocket just falls, but does not explode, the cushions might cushion the landing.  Even so, the cushion imagery gets me unsettled.  This too is a good thing -- a reminder that no amount of capital can make up for truly rotten assets, and that asset valuation remains the elusive nub of it.

Comments

Your last point remains key for me. Obviously if this worked perfectly, eventually the ratio would simply approach 1 and the financial institution would not do the thing. The obvious problem is when the ratio should be 1 (or wherever the point of unprofitability is), but the bank has figured out a way to keep the actual ratio below that.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Contributors

Current Guests

Follow Us On Twitter

Like Us on Facebook

  • Like Us on Facebook

    By "Liking" us on Facebook, you will receive excerpts of our posts in your Facebook news feed. (If you change your mind, you can undo it later.) Note that this is different than "Liking" our Facebook page, although a "Like" in either place will get you Credit Slips post on your Facebook news feed.

News Feed

Categories

Bankr-L

  • As a public service, the University of Illinois College of Law operates Bankr-L, an e-mail list on which bankruptcy professionals can exchange information. Bankr-L is administered by one of the Credit Slips bloggers, Professor Robert M. Lawless of the University of Illinois. Although Bankr-L is a free service, membership is limited only to persons with a professional connection to the bankruptcy field (e.g., lawyer, accountant, academic, judge). To request a subscription on Bankr-L, click here to visit the page for the list and then click on the link for "Subscribe." After completing the information there, please also send an e-mail to Professor Lawless (rlawless@illinois.edu) with a short description of your professional connection to bankruptcy. A link to a URL with a professional bio or other identifying information would be great.

OTHER STUFF