Exactly Why We Need Her There
Not that any of the other candidates are for sale. I don't know Eugene Kimmelman at all, but I have a very high respect for Michael Barr and his work. The difference is that Professor Warren never even wanted to be in Washington. I'm sure she wants to run the Bureau because of its ability to make a tremendous difference in the lives of ordinary people. But I also suspect that doing so would be a personal sacrifice for her. Sadly, that's exactly why she is the best person for the job.
By the way, I challenge anyone who questions her management skills to spend an hour in her legendary, first-year Contracts class. It will make you think twice before you use the words "management" and "skill" in the same sentence again.
I would prefer to see her on the Supreme Court, which badly needs a corrective to its current bias against the ordinary citizen (worth less than $100M).
Posted by: PF | July 29, 2010 at 02:52 PM
Seconded, but this could be a springboard.
Posted by: Geoff | July 30, 2010 at 12:37 PM
The videos of her grilling Timothy Geithner took me right back to 1L contracts.
Posted by: Adam Levitin | July 30, 2010 at 08:01 PM
Todd Zywicki, champion of the BAPCPA - certainly one of the top 10 worst drafted laws in American history (but a law which he could not find anything wrong with) - criticizes the choice of Elizabeth Warren:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704523604575512060220672440.html
"By appointing another White House czar to avoid Senate confirmation, the administration politicized the powerful new bureaucracy from its birth. And by appointing an individual with a track record of using questionable research to advance policy ends, it has jeopardized the second goal as well."
Posted by: AMC | September 30, 2010 at 08:12 AM