« Welcome Back Christian Weller | Main | LA Times: Illegal Immigrants Have Lower Mortgage Delinquency Rates »

This is a Financial Crisis like Any Other – Treat it Like One

posted by Christian E. Weller

I wanted to thank Bob Lawless, Elizabeth Warren and Credit Slips to invite me back as guest blogger. It seems an appropriate time to discuss topics in two of my areas of expertise -- financial crises and retirement income security -- as they are directly related to the current financial turmoil.

The markets are crashing. This is a standard financial crisis, as many other countries experienced over the past twenty or so years. In a crisis four risks materialize: default risk, maturity risk, interest rate risk, and exchange rate risk. We are spared from the last one since the dollar dropped well before this crisis. The problem is that we are not adequately addressing the remaining risks.

Default risk is always part of finance, but it spikes in a crisis. Borrowers cannot pay back their loans and bad loans accumulate on the balance sheets of banks, taking down financial institutions. The bailout was intended to solve this problem. But, the $700 billion Wall Street rescue only cures the symptoms, not the disease. It does not make it easier for homeowners to stay in their homes. To do that, we would need additional steps, such as bankruptcy reform, easier workout solutions for struggling homeowners to refinance their loans, and a second economic stimulus to boost household incomes.

Maturity risk exists because banks are supposed to bridge the inherent maturity mismatch between short-term deposits and long-term loans. But in a crisis this function is broken because banks are not sure that they will have enough short-term deposits to finance long-term commitments. Thus, maturity risk can bring down entire economies. When short-term capital, so-called "hot money", leaves economies, credit markets cramp up because banks run out of cash.

We now see depositors and other lenders to banks completely withdraw their funds or lend only on a short-term basis. Banks don’t know if they will have enough cash to meet all of the demands and thus stop making longer-term loans or even recall loans, e.g. by reducing credit lines.

The Fed's policies are intended to fill this gap. They are supposed to play the role of depositors, when depositors put their money under their mattresses rather than in a bank. Public pronouncements and FDIC insurance increases are meant to do the same.

So, why is this not working? There could be several explanations. First, the gap may be too big for the Fed to fill. Second, there is a reputation problem. Banks that borrow from the Fed may be seen as weaker than other banks and thus may precipitate a bank run.

What can be done? The federal government could step in, take equity stakes in some banks, and tell them where to lend. In essence, we may need a federal development bank that would extend credit for worthwhile projects. The treasury and other governments are already discussing taking equity stakes in financial institutions. Now, the government needs to think how it can act like a banker not just like a lender of last resort.

Even if banks have all the money that they need to lend for longer-term projects, there is still interest rate risk. The interest rate on a loan is fixed for long time. A bank, though, finances this loan out of revolving deposits with shorter maturities. The interest rates on these can fluctuate wildly. Right now, all interest rates are low. If banks think that they are too low, they may want to wait to lock in higher long-term interest rates. More importantly, banks may be worried that short-term interest rates could go up again.

If raising interest rates at this point seems silly, remember that this is what typically happens in a crisis. Central banks raise rates to prevent capital from fleeing a country. The Fed and other central banks are doing the right thing by coordinating their interest rates to avoid interest rate competition, what is commonly referred to as a “beggar-thy-neighbor” policy approach. The G-7 meeting in Washington, DC on October 10 reaffirmed the willingness of policymakers to solve the crisis, but they missed an opportunity to state that they will regularly consult and coordinate their actions in this crisis until there is a resolution. Such a desperately needed statement would reassure market participants that there won’t be harmful of policy competition and that policymakers in different countries won’t work at cross-purposes with each other.


"What can be done? The federal government could step in, take equity stakes in some banks, and tell them where to lend."

From Paulson's comments after the G7, the government is going to step in, take an equity stake in some banks, and tell them nothing.

The plan is to buy non-voting shares, specifically so that the government has no power to tell the banks what to do.

I understood the equity-stake plan explicitly NOT to include your third (and seemingly quite important) clause of a solution to maturity risk: "and tell them where to lend." I gather that federal law somehow prevents the gov't from taking voting (controlling) equity stakes in private banks that would give the gov't operational control (of sorts). I found this odd, so maybe the report is wrong or I misunderstood. Have I misunderstood, or is an equity infusion doomed also, as it can't accomplish the third of your maturity-crisis goals? [And by the way, why wouldn't the banks that get the equity infusion just continue to hoard that cash, as well, unless the gov't CAN "tell them where to lend"?]

This is very stupid. Don't you see the TED is already at historical high level? The fact is though Fed lowered the discount rate, the spread between commercial loan rate and government loan rate is very large, which makes the commercial lending rate already high now.

With the bailout and everything, will publicly traded banks and investment firms still fail or is everyone going to get saved. It seems as if it is okay to save Wall Street, however, we will let Chrysler GM, and Ford, sit on the verge of bankruptcy. We can not let MS fail but who cares about Detroit.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Current Guests

Follow Us On Twitter

Like Us on Facebook

  • Like Us on Facebook

    By "Liking" us on Facebook, you will receive excerpts of our posts in your Facebook news feed. (If you change your mind, you can undo it later.) Note that this is different than "Liking" our Facebook page, although a "Like" in either place will get you Credit Slips post on your Facebook news feed.



  • As a public service, the University of Illinois College of Law operates Bankr-L, an e-mail list on which bankruptcy professionals can exchange information. Bankr-L is administered by one of the Credit Slips bloggers, Professor Robert M. Lawless of the University of Illinois. Although Bankr-L is a free service, membership is limited only to persons with a professional connection to the bankruptcy field (e.g., lawyer, accountant, academic, judge). To request a subscription on Bankr-L, click here to visit the page for the list and then click on the link for "Subscribe." After completing the information there, please also send an e-mail to Professor Lawless ([email protected]) with a short description of your professional connection to bankruptcy. A link to a URL with a professional bio or other identifying information would be great.